| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Fix remaining lints | Sandro Jäckel | 2023-10-25 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | Fix linting errors | Sandro Jäckel | 2022-10-28 | 1 | -3/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | Format with go 1.19 | Sandro Jäckel | 2022-10-26 | 1 | -128/+128 |
| | | |||||
| * | add support for RequestOptions in lo.Append() | Muhammad Talal Anwar | 2018-09-06 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | make the IsEqualTo() methods public | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-05-30 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | | |||||
| * | proof-read documentation | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-05-03 | 1 | -17/+16 |
| | | |||||
| * | test coverage for large object operations | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-05-02 | 1 | -2/+11 |
| | | |||||
| * | revamp the LargeObject API | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-05-02 | 1 | -218/+333 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | I thought about this some more, and I believe the Writer-based approach in the previous version of the LargeObject API does not scale: It makes it very hard to write code that uploads segments without resorting to a buffer the same size as the segments. I don't want gigabyte-scale buffers filling up my RAM, so this commit switches to a different API based on Readers. LargeObject.Append() now behaves very similar to Object.Upload(), which I find quite nice. | ||||
| * | add DeleteOptions to Object.Delete() | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-04-30 | 1 | -5/+18 |
| | | |||||
| * | initial support for large objects | Stefan Majewsky | 2018-04-30 | 1 | -0/+689 |
| This has gone through a lot of iterations on my branch, and I'm quite happy with the parts of the API that exist now. Test coverage can still be better, and will get better in the following commits. The API is not yet finished: I want to add Options arguments to Object.Upload(), Object.Copy(), Object.Move() and Object.Delete() that specify how each of these operations affect existing segments (and, later, also existing symlinks). For Upload(), uploading in segments shall become as easy as flipping a single switch. | |||||
